Tous les comptes rendus municipaux disponibles sur Pappers Politique !

Pappers Politique vous permet d'accéder et d'explorer les comptes rendus, délibérations et procès verbaux de conseils municipaux :
  • Anticipez les besoins et projets dans les municipalités et plus particulièrement les appels d'offre à venir.
  • Identifiez les communes actives sur vos thématiques de prédilection
Réserver une démo avec un expert

Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM)

Question écrite de M. Danilo Oscar LANCINI - Commission européenne

Question de M. Danilo Oscar LANCINI, Mme Elena LIZZI,

Diffusée le 9 février 2022

Subject: Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM)

In the impact assessment on the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), the Commission stated that the phase-out of the free allocation of allowances under the Emissions Trading System (ETS) would have a negative impact on both employment and exports. This is even more worrying considering that the carbon price is now much higher than the assumptions in the impact assessment and it could lead to an increasing risk of carbon leakage.

In a recent trade case with the USA, the Commission argued that free allocation does not represent a WTO illegal subsidy because it is neither a financial contribution nor foregone government revenue and does not provide a benefit to EU companies.

Meanwhile, the Commission told Parliament’s ENVI and INTA committees that the coexistence of CBAM and free allocation is not WTO compatible because of double protection, and an export solution is not WTO compatible because it is an illegal WTO subsidy.

Can the Commission please clarify whether it is legally possible and consistent with international trade law:

1. to complement full benchmark-based free allocation with CBAM for emissions that are not already covered by free allocation for a transition period?

2. to implement/include an export mechanism to the EU ETS and CBAM in a WTO compatible way (such as through ETS free allocation for export)?

Réponse - Commission européenne

Diffusée le 17 mars 2022

Answer given by Mr Gentiloni on behalf of the European Commission

(18 March 2022)

At present, the risk of carbon leakage in some sectors strongly exposed to international trade is addressed in the EU through the free allocation of allowances under the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) and by the possibility for Member States to compensate for the increase in electricity prices resulting from the EU ETS. The Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) would be an alternative to these mechanisms.

Under the proposal for CBAM (1), the reduction of free allocation should be implemented gradually while the CBAM is phased-in, to allow producers, importers and traders to adjust to the new regime.

This process cannot at any point result in more favourable treatment of EU production vis-à-vis imports. This means that the phase- in is coordinated with the phasing-out of the free allocation of EU ETS to installations in the EU laid down in the directive 2003/87/EC (2) and in the relevant delegated acts.

The proposal of the Commission has been carefully crafted to be in line with WTO rules.

⋅1∙ COM(2021) 564 final; https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52021PC0564

⋅2∙ Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading

within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC, OJ L 275, 25.10.2003, p. 32.



Questions similaires

Déposée le 23 février 2020 à 23h00
Similarité de la question: 68% Similarité de la réponse: 62%
Déposée le 30 mai 2022 à 22h00
Similarité de la question: 68% Similarité de la réponse: 70%
Déposée le 29 juin 2021 à 22h00
Similarité de la question: 69% Similarité de la réponse: 68%
Déposée le 18 octobre 2021 à 22h00
Similarité de la question: 66% Similarité de la réponse: 66%
Déposée le 15 mars 2021 à 23h00
Similarité de la question: 64% Similarité de la réponse: 69%
Déposée le 6 juillet 2021 à 22h00
Similarité de la question: 65% Similarité de la réponse: 67%